Tevac, Inc. v. Dynamics eShop, Inc.
| Tevac, Inc. |
| Dynamics eShop, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv03650 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER: Initial Conference set for 9/24/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 830 before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. See Order and Attachment. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 8/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 AYS Rules) (Torres, Jasmine)
|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and, COUNTERCLAIM against Tevac, Inc. by Dynamics eShop, Inc.. (Shapiro, Peter) |
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dynamics eShop, Inc. (Shapiro, Peter) |
|
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Nunc Pro Tunc: In light of Defendant's retention of new counsel in this action, the request to extend the time to answer or move with respect to Plaintiff's Complaint is granted, despite Plaintiff's objections. Dynamics eShop, Inc. answer due 8/13/2019. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 7/31/2019. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Tevac, Inc.. (McDevitt, Tara) |
| Filing 12 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Dynamics eShop, Inc.. (Shapiro, Peter) |
|
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Substitute Attorney: Attorney Richard A. Burke terminated. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 7/30/2019. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Dynamics eShop, Inc.. (Shapiro, Peter) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter T. Shapiro on behalf of Dynamics eShop, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Shapiro, Peter) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard A. Burke on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Burke, Richard) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tevac, Inc.. Dynamics eShop, Inc. served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. (McDevitt, Tara) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Dynamics eShop, Inc. (Valle, Christine) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Tevac, Inc. (McDevitt, Tara) |
| Proposed Summons #5 is rejected; Proposed Summons has not been completed; the Clerk's Office cannot issue the summons. Counsel is advised to submit a completed proposed summons using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Valle, Christine) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Tevac, Inc. (McDevitt, Tara) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Tevac, Inc. (McDevitt, Tara) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Please submit a Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dynamics eShop, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11600486 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Tevac, Inc.. (McDevitt, Tara) Modified on 6/24/2019 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tevac, Inc. v. Dynamics eShop, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dynamics eShop, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Peter T. Shapiro |
| Represented By: | Richard A. Burke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tevac, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Tara Dawn McDevitt |
| Represented By: | Linda S. Agnew |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
