Eiden v. County Of Nassau et al
| Steven Eiden |
| County Of Nassau, John and Jane Doe 1-10, Michael Schwartz, Sabrina Gregg, Nestor Castro and Nicholas Brengel |
| 2:2019cv03876 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven I Locke |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 9/19/2019 at 2:30 PM before Judge Joan M. Azrack in Courtroom 920 of the Long Island Courthouse. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 8/13/2019. (Posillico, Lauren)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Nicholas Brengel, Nestor Castro, County Of Nassau, Sabrina Gregg, Michael Schwartz. (Fuchs, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Eiden. Nicholas Brengel served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Klein, Brett) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Eiden. Nestor Castro served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Klein, Brett) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Eiden. Michael Schwartz served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Klein, Brett) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Eiden. Sabrina Gregg served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Klein, Brett) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Eiden. County Of Nassau served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Klein, Brett) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Nicholas Brengel, #2 Proposed Summons Nestor Castro, #3 Proposed Summons Sabrina Gregg, #4 Proposed Summons Michael Schwartz) (Doudalis, Evelyn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/11/2019: #5 Rider for Summonses) (Cubano, Jazmin). |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Doudalis, Evelyn) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Doudalis, Evelyn) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Doudalis, Evelyn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nicholas Brengel, Nestor Castro, County Of Nassau, Sabrina Gregg, John and Jane Doe 1-10, Michael Schwartz filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11634099 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Steven Eiden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons) (Klein, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
