Dymond et. al. v. Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC
Jeetindra Rajkumar and Heather Dymond |
Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC |
2:2019cv05818 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Margo K Brodie |
Robert M Levy |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Stay. The Court grants the parties' application and orders a forty-five day stay of all deadlines in this case. This action is stayed until January 27, 2020 Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 12/11/2019. (Williams, Tenisha) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION to Adjourn Conference , Consent MOTION to Stay , Consent MOTION for Settlement by Heather Dymond, Jeetindra Rajkumar. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Heather Dymond, Jeetindra Rajkumar (Barshay, David) |
ORDER: A complaint in the above captioned case was filed on October 15, 2019 and an answer was due on November 13, 2019. To date, no answer has been filed. Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to either move for default judgment in the above captioned case, or submit a written explanation to the Court as to why they have not done so by December 16, 2019. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a recommendation to Judge Brodie that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 12/9/2019. (Marino, Janine) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Heather Dymond, Jeetindra Rajkumar. Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC served on 10/23/2019, answer due 11/13/2019. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
Case Assigned to Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of Heather Dymond, Jeetindra Rajkumar (aty to be noticed) (Barshay, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11944860 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Heather Dymond, Jeetindra Rajkumar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.