Christie El v. Deutsche Bank National et al
Cynthel Christie El |
Sallie Mae, LVNV Funding LLC, Supreme Court, Nassau County, Office of Court Administration, Nassau County Sheriff Department, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, America, Nassau County Police Department, Duane Morris, LLP, Thomas A. Adams, Edward Fregosi, Jr., PHH Mortgage Services, RAS Boriskin LLC, Sallie Mae Inc., Supreme Court State of New York County of Nassau, Nassau County Sherriff's Office and Deutsche Bank National |
2:2019cv06423 |
November 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
William F Kuntz |
Robert M Levy |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail this order to the address of record and close this case. SO Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 1/14/2020. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
Civil Case Terminated as per Memorandum and Order #9 . (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 NOTICE, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate, unsigned by Plaintiff. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cynthel Christie El. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Cynthel Christie re: Case. Postal Notation: Return to sender, attempted- not known, unable to forward. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Cynthel Christie -deficiency ntc dtd 11/22/19 returned as undeliverable unable to forward (Bollbach, Jean) |
Filing 4 Letter dtd 11/26/19 from pro se office to pro se RE: this letter acknowledges receipt of your civil action (Bollbach, Jean) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. re: #1 Complaint. The papers are deficient as a filing fee of $400 (consisting of a $350 civil action filing fee and $50 administrative fee), is required in order to commence a civil action. Alternatively, you may request to waive the filing fee by completing an IFP application. (Cox, Dwayne) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Cynthel Christie El. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.