Wu v. Destiny Maternity Corporation
Plaintiff: Kathy Wu
Defendant: Destiny Maternity Corporation
Case Number: 2:2019cv06537
Filed: November 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Roanne L Mann
Referring Judge: Kiyo A Matsumoto
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42:1201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE, the Plaintiffs by her attorney hereby gives notice that the claims in the above-captioned case are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice against Defendant DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION. Any and all claims against Defendant DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION shall not be prejudiced by this notice. (Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 12/5/2019) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
December 5, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Kathy Wu (Solotoff, Darryn)
November 19, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Destiny Maternity Corporation. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
November 19, 2019 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
November 19, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Chief Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
November 19, 2019 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Vanderbilt, Evelyn)
November 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Destiny Maternity Corporation filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12079520 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Kathy Wu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Destiny Maternity Corporation) (Solotoff, Darryn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wu v. Destiny Maternity Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathy Wu
Represented By: Darryn G. Solotoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Destiny Maternity Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?