Kumar et al v. Matherson Organics
| Kimberly Kareus, Shelby Stempkowski, Sonia Kumar and Mary Schnurer |
| Matherson Organics and Matherson Organics doing business as Active Wow |
| 2:2020cv05011 |
| October 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The time for Matherson Organics to answer, move against or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to and including January 5, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 12/17/2020. (Jacobwitz, Beth)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Nicole Margolies on behalf of Matherson Organics (aty to be noticed) (Margolies, Lauren) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn T. Graham on behalf of Matherson Organics (aty to be noticed) (Graham, Glenn) |
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Matherson Organics. (Castello, Geoffrey) |
|
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The time for Defendant to answer, move against or otherwise respond to the complaint is hereby extended to and including December 21, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 11/13/2020. (Jacobwitz, Beth)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Matherson Organics. (Castello, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Schnurer, Sonia Kumar, Shelby Stempkowski, Kimberly Kareus. Matherson Organics served on 10/29/2020, answer due 11/19/2020. (Federman, William) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Matherson Organics. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matherson Organics filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13546288 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Mary Schnurer, Sonia Kumar, Shelby Stempkowski, Kimberly Kareus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Federman, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
