Consistent International Company, LTD. v. Ray Padula Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: Consistent International Company, LTD.
Defendant: Ray Padula Holdings, LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv04890
Filed: August 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Anne Y Shields
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Consistent International Company, LTD.. Ray Padula Holdings, LLC served on 9/9/2021, answer due 9/30/2021. (Siegfried, Jeremy)
August 31, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ray Padula Holdings, LLC. (Landow, Concetta)
August 31, 2021 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
August 31, 2021 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta)
August 31, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
August 30, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Consistent International Company, LTD. (Siegfried, Jeremy)
August 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ray Padula Holdings, LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14796129 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Consistent International Company, LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Unpaid Invoices, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Siegfried, Jeremy) Modified on 8/31/2021 (Landow, Concetta). (Attachment 1 replaced for statistical purposes- original pdf flagged as corrupt on 9/1/2021) (Florio, Lisa).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Consistent International Company, LTD. v. Ray Padula Holdings, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Consistent International Company, LTD.
Represented By: Jeremy Siegfried
Represented By: Jared Riley Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Padula Holdings, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?