Haunss v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Richard Haunss
Defendant: Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv05397
Filed: September 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Lee G Dunst
2 Judge: Nicholas G Garaufis
3 Judge: Marcia M Henry
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2022 Filing 9 STATUS REPORT by Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) Associated Cases: 1:22-md-03044-NGG-MMH et al. (Bjork, Sheryl)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer: Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 12/07/2022 or otherwise ordered by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 10/31/2022. (JD)
October 28, 2022 Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc.. (Singer Mekles, Erica) Modified on 10/31/2022 to change event type (JD).
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER denying #6 : The motion to stay proceedings is denied as moot. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 10/27/2022. (JD)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE ORDER NO. 1. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 10/25/2022. Associated Cases: 1:22-md-03044-NGG-MMH et al. (TL)
October 18, 2022 Cases associated 1:22-md-3044. (TL)
October 18, 2022 Case Reassigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis. Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (TL)
October 5, 2022 Filing 6 Letter MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to letter motion request) (Singer Mekles, Erica)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry (as related to 22-cv-1974) for all further proceedings. Judge Joan M. Azrack, Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/20/2022. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 12, 2022 Filing 5 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (Landow, Concetta)
September 12, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Landow, Concetta)
September 12, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
September 12, 2022 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 12, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
September 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15925409 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Richard Haunss. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Baughman, Laura)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haunss v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Haunss
Represented By: Laura Jean Baughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exactech, Inc.
Represented By: Erica Michelle Singer Mekles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exactech, US, Inc.
Represented By: Erica Michelle Singer Mekles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?