Farrell v. Colvin
| Patricia Anne Farrell |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| 2:2025cv00322 |
| January 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, and Joint Proposed Schedule by Carolyn W. Colvin. (Hurd, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher N Hurd on behalf of Carolyn W. Colvin (aty to be noticed) (Hurd, Christopher) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Gary R. Brown. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| NOTICE to Assign District Judge: The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to a district judge. (CT) |
ORDER: If all parties consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, they shall file a written consent form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge no later than 2/18/2025 PURSUANT TO EDNY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2023-23 ("In cases exempt from Rule 16 scheduling orders - pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 - all parties must file a consent form no later than 30 days following the appearance of all defendants, except that in an action: a. Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the deadline will be 30 days following the notification to the Commissioner, as provided in Social Security Supplemental Rule 3."). Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 1/19/2025. (GS)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (SMF) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (SMF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carolyn W. Colvin filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18677665 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Patricia Anne Farrell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (DeHaan, John) Modified on 1/17/2025 (SMF). |
| Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SMF) |
| Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case.No summons shall issue. Carolyn W. Colvin served on 1/17/2025, answer due 3/18/2025. (SMF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Farrell v. Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia Anne Farrell | |
| Represented By: | John W. DeHaan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
| Represented By: | Christopher N Hurd |
| Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
