Masson v. Stryker Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Ruby Masson
Defendant: Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. individually doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics
Case Number: 2:2025cv02222
Filed: April 22, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Referring Judge: Anne Y Shields
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2025 Case transferred from New York Eastern has been opened in District of Massachusetts as case 1:25-cv-11508, filed 05/27/2025. (LF)
May 21, 2025 Filing 7 CERTIFIED JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-76): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the District of Massachusetts for the reasons stated in the order of April 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani. (GO)
May 21, 2025 Case electronically transferred to District of Massachusetts. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (GO)
May 15, 2025 Filing 6 STATE COURT RECORD received from COUNTY OF SUFFOLK E-filed Supreme Court Case, Index No. 604355/2025. (CV)
May 1, 2025 Filing 5 JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-76): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the District of Massachusetts for the reasons stated in the order of April 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. (LF)
April 29, 2025 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Howmedica Osteonics Corp. answer due 6/16/2025; Stryker Corporation answer due 6/16/2025. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 4/29/2025. (DM)
April 28, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Asfendis, Paul)
April 23, 2025 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (LJ)
April 23, 2025 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ)
April 23, 2025 Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ)
April 22, 2025 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation from Supreme Court of New York, County of Suffolk, case number 604355/2025. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-18975839) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Certificate of Service) (Asfendis, Paul) Modified on 4/23/2025 (LJ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Masson v. Stryker Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruby Masson
Represented By: Kenneth J. Ready
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Corporation
Represented By: Paul Edward Asfendis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp. individually doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics
Represented By: Paul Edward Asfendis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?