U.S.A. v. Izumi Corporation
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Izumi Corporation Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2000cv00351
Filed: January 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Uniondale Office
Presiding Judge: Thomas C. Platt
Presiding Judge: Viktor V. Pohorelsky
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 USA Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER as to ERNESTO QUINTIERI - Defendants' motion for a writ of audita querela is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Thomas C. Platt on 1/22/13. (Coleman, Laurie)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S.A. v. Izumi Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Vincent Lipari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Izumi Corporation Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?