Page, et al v. Monroe, et al
| 1:2002cv00526 |
| April 16, 2002 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
315
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for a new trial is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that a retrial shall be held on issues of liability and apportionment thereof; and it is further ORDERED, that a conference be arranged at a time of convenience for the parties to discuss further proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on April 19, 2010. (sas)
|
|
Filing
247
DECISION & ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for a certificate of appealability (Dkt. No. 221) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 11, 2009. (sas)
|
|
Filing
201
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 160 Motion to Dismiss; granting 167 Letter Request; granting 171 Letter Request: All Cross Defendants are DISMISSED. Cross motion for costs and attorney fees: DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 5/13/09. (tab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Page, et al v. Monroe, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
