Bradley v. Rell

Bradley v. Rell

Plaintiff:	Shawn T. Bradley
Defendant:	B. Rell
Case Number:	1:2007cv00148
Filed:	February 8, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Albany Office
County:	Ulster
Presiding Judge:	David N. Hurd
Presiding Judge:	Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 11, 2010	Filing 79 JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT: this action is DISMISSED in its entirety without prejudice to the right of the parties to secure reinstatement of the case within sixty (60) days after the date of this judgment by making a showing that the settlement was not, in fact, consummated; and in the event that no request is made for reinstatement within sixty (60) days of the date of this judgment, the dismissal of this case shall thereafter be with prejudice. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail).
March 26, 2010	Filing 77 DECISION & ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Summary Judgment, granted with regard to (1) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and (2) Plaintiff's claims agains t Defendant Keller, denied with regard to Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendants Hadsel, Woltman, Feeney and Rell. Therefore the following claims are dismissed from this action, (1) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, and (2) all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Maisenhelder, Keller, and John Doe Desk Officer. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/25/2010. (jmb)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 11, 2010

Filing 79 JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT: this action is DISMISSED in its entirety without prejudice to the right of the parties to secure reinstatement of the case within sixty (60) days after the date of this judgment by making a showing that the settlement was not, in fact, consummated; and in the event that no request is made for reinstatement within sixty (60) days of the date of this judgment, the dismissal of this case shall thereafter be with prejudice. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail).

March 26, 2010

Filing 77 DECISION & ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Summary Judgment, granted with regard to (1) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and (2) Plaintiff's claims agains t Defendant Keller, denied with regard to Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendants Hadsel, Woltman, Feeney and Rell. Therefore the following claims are dismissed from this action, (1) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, and (2) all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Maisenhelder, Keller, and John Doe Desk Officer. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/25/2010. (jmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradley v. Rell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn T. Bradley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: B. Rell
Represented By:	Robert D. Cook
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?