Gorham-DiMaggio v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
| Kim Gorham-DiMaggio |
| Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., LP, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, Countrywide Financial Corp. and Investor Number 1688597323 |
| 1:2008cv00019 |
| January 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Schenectady |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 88) is DENIED, and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 92) is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 08, 2010. (sas)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, even with all of its subsequent permutations, is DENIED. Consequently, the remaining cause of action, which was permitted by Judge Kahn, singularly alleges that Defendants failed to tim ely respond to Plaintff's purported qualified written request, dated 6/15/07. Accordingly, this Count still stands and may be amended consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 6/19/09. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
