Pope et al v. County of Albany et al
| Anne Pope, Janis Gonzalez and Wanda Willingham |
| County of Albany and Albany County Board of Elections |
| 1:2011cv00736 |
| June 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| David R. Homer |
| Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
454
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 438) for attorneys fees is GRANTED in part; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs are awarded $1,602,886.75 in attorneys fees and $127,532.05 in costs; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 453) to strike Plaintiffs Letter Brief is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 16, 2015. (sas)
|
|
Filing
427
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Judgment be entered for Plaintiffs on the issue of vote dilution in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants are enjoined from holding any further elections unde r the plan enacted in Local Law C; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants submit a remedial plan to the Court within three weeks of the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Plaintiffs may submit a response within two weeks thereafter. De fendants will be given one week after Plaintiffs response to file a reply; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs second Motion (Dkt. No. 372) for a preliminary injunction is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 404) for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Motion (Dkt. No. 418) is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs in an amount to be determined by the Court at a later date. Plaintiffs are ordered to file a motion concerning the amount of attorneys fees and costs for which they seek reimbursement. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 24, 2015. (sas)
|
|
Filing
253
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 214) for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 209) for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court fin ds that there is no genuine issue of fact as to the assertion that the black community in the County of Albany is sufficiently large and geographically compact to form five majority-minority districts. There are unresolved issues of material fact as to all other elements of Plaintiffs claims; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 226) for leave to amend is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs may file a second amended complaint within seven (7) days of this orde r to add proposed plaintiffs Vicente Alfonso, Stephanie Davis, and Elaine Frazier; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants may schedule deposition of Vicente Alfonso, Stephanie Davis, and Elaine Frazier within thirty (30) days of the filing of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 28, 2014. (sas)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 12) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 18, 2011. (sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
