Donohue et al v. The State of New York et al
Danny Donohue, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Milo Barlow, Thomas Jefferson, Cornelius Kennedy, Judy Richards and Henry Wagoner |
The State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State Civil Service Department, Patricia A. Hite, New York State Civil Service Commission, Caroline W. Ahl, J. Dennis Hanrahan, Robert L. Megna, Thomas P. DiNapoli, The New York State and Local Retirement System, Jonathan Lippman and The New York State Unified Court System |
1:2011cv01530 |
December 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Albany Office |
Albany |
Mae A. D'Agostino |
David R. Homer |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 93 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 97 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 93) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS tha t Plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 97) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiffs' motion to preclude the declarations of Dominic Colafati and Darryl Decker is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Defendants' favor and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance in the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/24/2018. (ban) |
Filing 63 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting in part and rejecting in part Report and Recommendations re 54 Report and Recommendations. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/20/15. (ban) |
Filing 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS & ORDER: It is ordered that the # 39 MOTION to Amend/Correct the # 6 Amended Complaint is GRANTED, Plaintiff's are directed to file and serve the Amended Complaint within 10 days of the date of this decision and th e parties are directed to follow the caption noted herein in all further submissions. Recommended that the # 44 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/11/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 7/25/2014. (jmb) |
Filing 26 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 22 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 7/9/13. (ban) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: ORDERED that defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint (Dkt. No. 11) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN P ART; it is further ORDERED that defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint as against the State of New York, New York State Civil Service Department, New York State Civil Service Commission, New York State and Local Retirement System a nd New York State Unified CourtSystem is GRANTED. All claims against these defendants are dismissed; it is further ORDERED that defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims for monetary damages asserted against defendants Hite, Ahl, Hanrahan, Megna , DiNapoli and Lippman in their official capacity is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims for injunctive anddeclaratory relief asserted against defendants Hite, Ahl, Hanrahan, Megna, DiNapoli and Lippman in their official capacity is GRANTED only to the extent that such claims seek retrospective relief; it is further ORDERED that defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs Article 78 claims is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that defendants motion is denied in all other respects. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 12/3/12. (ban) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.