Clark v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brian Clark
Defendant: Cumberland Farms, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv01508
Filed: October 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Schenectady
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 19) for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 19, 2014. (sas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Clark
Represented By: James W. Bendall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cumberland Farms, Inc.
Represented By: Eugene D. Napierski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?