Murphy v. Gibbons et al
| Vernon Murphy |
| Thomas Gibbons, Brian Mascaro and John Doe(s) |
| 1:2013cv01433 |
| November 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER - That the 78 Report-Recommendation and Order is ADOPTED in its entirety. That this action is dismissed due to Plaintiff's apparent abandonment, failure to prosecute, and failure to provide an updated address. See N.D.N.Y.L.R. 41.2(b)(dismissal of action appropriate where petitioner fails to notify Court of change of address). That the Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/30/2017. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(jel, )
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That defendants' 12 motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED with respect to Murphy's entire second and seventh causes of action, and his claims related to the retention of his property and malicious prosecution, and those causes of actions/claims are DISMISSED and DENIED in all other respects. That the parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece to schedule further proceedings in accordance with this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/29/2014. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
