Myers v. The People of the State of New York (Department of Motor Vehicles) et al
Plaintiff: |
Scott Myers |
Defendant: |
The People of the State of New York (Department of Motor Vehicles), The Town of Saugerties, District Attorney of Ulster County, Town of Saugerties Judge Daniel Lamb, Town of Saugerties Patrolman Gambino, Town of Saugerties Sheriff and Attorney Michael Catalanotto |
Case Number: |
1:2014cv01492 |
Filed: |
December 10, 2014 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Office: |
Albany Office |
County: |
Ulster |
Presiding Judge: |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
Presiding Judge: |
Christian F. Hummel |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights: Other |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 28, 2017 |
Filing
79
DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motions for Reconsideration (Dkt. Nos. 71, 73) are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion for Recusal and Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 77) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Motion for Expedited Consideration is DENIED as moot (Dkt. No. 78. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 28, 2017. (sas)
|
March 24, 2017 |
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDERED, that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 60) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Myerss Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 49) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and it is further ORDERED, that Myerss Motion for Mandatory Arbitration or Trial Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 65) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 24, 2017. (sas)
|
May 9, 2016 |
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs claims for false arrest, physical and verbal abuse at the scene of arrest, creating a false demand to obtain a chemical breath test, denying Plaintiffs request for counsel at the scene of arrest, perfo rming aggressive tests on Plaintiff and making up the answers, unlawfully seizing Plaintiffs car, searching Plaintiffs car without permission, lying during the administrative hearing, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and cruel and unusua l punishment under the Eighth Amendment are DISMISSED as untimely; and it is furtherORDERED, that Plaintiffs claims for interfering with Plaintiffs right to parent his children and damaging Plaintiffs reputation, causing direct harm to Plaintiff by f ailing to correct false claims, and causing community damage to Plaintiff are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim; and it is furtherORDERED, that Plaintiffs fourth, sixth, and eleventh causes of action shall be construed as asserting a claim that Plaintiff was deprived of due process during his bench trial before Judge Lamb that survives initial review and requires a response from Defendant by May 23, 2016. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on May 09, 2016. ***A copy of this order was served upon the pro se party by regular US mail.(sas)
|
February 9, 2016 |
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 34) to dismiss is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Cross-Motion (Dkt. No. 38) is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff submit a second ame nded complaint setting forth all of the facts and claims that the Court will consider when conducting an initial review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order as set forth above; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff submit a memorandum of law addressing the timeliness of his claims within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order as set forth above(3/10/16). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 09, 2016.***A copy of this order was served upon the pro se plaintiff by regular US mail. (sas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?