Minholz v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
Lauren Minholz |
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Raytheon Company, Alaska Structures, Inc., Weatherport Shelter Systems LLC and Dutton-Lainson Company |
1:2016cv00154 |
February 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Albany Office |
Saratoga |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Thomas J. McAvoy |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 DECISION & ORDER that WeatherPort Shelter Systems LLC's 36 Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) is granted and the action against WeatherPort Shelter Systems LLC is dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdictio n. WeatherPort Shelter Systems LLC's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) is denied as moot; Lockheed Martin Corporation's 44 Motion to Dismiss is granted and the action against Lockheed Martin Corporation is dismissed w ithout prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction; Alaska Structures, Inc.'s 52 Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) is granted and the action against Alaska Structures, Inc. is dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. Alaska Structures, Inc.'s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) is denied as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/30/2016. (see) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.