R.H. v. Board of Education Saugerties Central School District

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Northern District R.H. v. Board of Education Saugerties Central School District

R.H. v. Board of Education Saugerties Central School District

Plaintiff:	R.H.
Defendant:	Board of Education Saugerties Central School District
Case Number:	1:2016cv00551
Filed:	May 11, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Albany Office
County:	Ulster
Presiding Judge:	Christian F. Hummel
Presiding Judge:	Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action:	20 U.S.C. § 1415
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 21, 2018	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That plaintiff's 15 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. That defendant's 19 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED as it relates to plaintiff's IDEA claim, Rehabilitation Act claims, ADA claims, and state law claim. DENIED AS MOOT in all other respects. That plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is dismissed in its entirety. That the decision of State Review Officer Harrington is AFFIRMED to the extent that it found plaintiff's unilateral placement of C.H. was inappropriate. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/21/2018. (jel, )
January 30, 2017	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying Pltf's 9 Motion to admit the May 2016 letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 1/30/17. (sfp, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 21, 2018

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That plaintiff's 15 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. That defendant's 19 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED as it relates to plaintiff's IDEA claim, Rehabilitation Act claims, ADA claims, and state law claim. DENIED AS MOOT in all other respects. That plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is dismissed in its entirety. That the decision of State Review Officer Harrington is AFFIRMED to the extent that it found plaintiff's unilateral placement of C.H. was inappropriate. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/21/2018. (jel, )

January 30, 2017

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying Pltf's 9 Motion to admit the May 2016 letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 1/30/17. (sfp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: R.H. v. Board of Education Saugerties Central School District
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: R.H.
Represented By:	Gina M. DeCrescenzo
Represented By:	Benjamin J. Hinerfeld
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Board of Education Saugerties Central School District
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?