Brooks et al v. Roberts
Plaintiff: Derrick Brooks, Clifton DeMeco and Brian Blowers
Defendant: Samuel D. Roberts
Case Number: 1:2016cv01025
Filed: August 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Schenectady
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER re 106 Stipulation filed by Samuel D. Roberts. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 6/13/2022. (khr)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 104 MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER that pltfs' 99 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED in part; that pltfs' 98 Motion for Costs is GRANTED; and pltfs are granted $265,671.92 in attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/19/2020. (see)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER ON STIPULATION AND ORDER OF SETTLEMENT.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/18/2019. (khr)
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 91 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment. The Settlement Agreement filed by the parties on June 14, 2019 is APPROVED as fair, reasonable, and adequate to the class of "All current or fo rmer New York State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ("SNAP") benefits recipients who had their SNAP benefits reduced or terminated between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, for failing to meet a work requirement applicable to able-bodied adults without dependents, pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 2015(o)(2) or 7 C.F.R. §§273.24(a)(1) and (b)."IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/17/2019. (khr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks et al v. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrick Brooks
Represented By: Saima A. Akhtar
Represented By: Susan C. Antos
Represented By: Marc Cohan
Represented By: Petra T. Tasheff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clifton DeMeco
Represented By: Saima A. Akhtar
Represented By: Susan C. Antos
Represented By: Marc Cohan
Represented By: Petra T. Tasheff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Blowers
Represented By: Saima A. Akhtar
Represented By: Susan C. Antos
Represented By: Marc Cohan
Represented By: Petra T. Tasheff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel D. Roberts
Represented By: C. Harris Dague
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?