Bitzko v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
| Christy Bitzko |
| Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA |
| 1:2017cv00458 |
| April 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Brenda K. Sannes |
| Daniel J. Stewart |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ORDER: It is ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement (Dkt. No. 107 ) and Joint Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. No. 108 ) are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No . 13 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment. It is further ORDERED that the terms of the Settlement Agreement are incorporated into this Order and that Court retains exclusive jurisdiction over the parties and the Settlement Class members to enforce the terms and provisions of the Agreement and this Order. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 8/10/2021. (nmk)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 84 motion to modify the class definition. The class definition is modified as follows "All consumers to whom Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA mailed letters to addresses within the jurisdiction of the Second Circuit Court of A ppeals seeking to collect debts: (i) which were primarily for personal, family, or household purposes; and (ii) which debts were subject to increase based on interest and/or late fees; and (iii) to whom WWR sent letters failing to disclose that the amount of the debt was subject to increase; (iv) during the period from on or after a date one year prior to the filing of this action and on or before a date 21 days after the filing of this action.". The parties are directed to file a joint status report regarding settlement by 11/18/2020. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 11/4/2020. (rjb, )
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Certify Class. Plaintiff's 15 U.S.C. § ; 1692g(a)(1) "amount of debt" claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is appointed as class representative and Interim Class Counsel Barshay Sanders, PLLC, is appointed as class counsel. The parties are directed to meet and confer regarding a proposed class notice and submit a proposed notice to the Court by October 7, 2019. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 9/23/2019. (rjb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bitzko v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christy Bitzko | |
| Represented By: | Stuart D. Werbin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
