Georges v. Hatser et al
||Joel Hatser, Joseph Ciavanitti and Kurt Bratten Brian
||November 13, 2017
||US District Court for the Northern District of New York
||Christian F. Hummel
||Glenn T. Suddaby
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 9, 2018
DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting # 5 Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's complaint is sua sponte dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be greante d. Plaintiff shall, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of this Decision and Order, SHOW CAUSE in writing why she should not be permanently ENJOINED from filing any future pleadings or documents of any kind (including motions) in this District wit hout first seeking and obtaining permission of the Chief District Judge or his or her designee (except pleadings or documents in a case that is open at the time of the issuance of the Courts Pre-Filing Order until that case is closed). The Clerk of the Court is directed to open a new pre-filing case number 9:18-pf-3 and file a copy of this Decision and Order in that pre-filing case. Plaintiffs response to this Order to Show Cause shall be filed in case number 9:18-pf-3. Iff Plaintiff does not fully comply with this Decision and Order, the Court will issue a subsequent order, without further explanation, permanently so enjoining Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/9/18. (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail) (lmw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?