Pendell v. United States Secret Service et al
||United States Secret Service and Kim Campbell
||March 21, 2018
||US District Court for the Northern District of New York
||Therese Wiley Dancks
||Glenn T. Suddaby
|Nature of Suit:
||Freedom of Information Act
|Cause of Action:
||05 U.S.C. § 552
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 16, 2019
DECISION AND ORDER that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 30 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 12/16/2019. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail).(sal)
|June 6, 2018
DECISION and ORDER: that Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7 ) is Accepted and Adopted in its entirety; that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kim Campbell are sua sponte Dismissed with prejudice for lack of subje ct-matter jurisdiction; that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant United States Secret Service survive the Court's sua sponte review of his Complaint; that the Clerk of the Court is directed to issue a Summons and forward it, along with a c opy of the Complaint containing General Order 25 (which sets forth the Civil Case Management Plan used by the Northern District of New York), to the U.S. Marshal for service upon Defendant USSS; and that, after service of process, Defendant USSS shal l file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 06/06/2018. (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff at Coxsackie Correctional Facility via regular mail on 6/7/2018.)(hmr)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?