Bitetto v. Kahn
| Dr. Marco Bitetto |
| Mr. Lawrence E. Kahn |
| 1:2018cv00969 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Rensselaer |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER finding as moot #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as Plaintiff previously moved to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) and such motion was granted (Dkt. No. 5).Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 08/31/18. (Copy served via regular mail)(cdb)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marco Bitetto. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Mailing Envelope) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (mgh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE- FACTS OF THE CASE filed by Marco Bitetto. (mgh) |
|
Filing 6
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION and ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that Plaintiff's #1 Complaint be DISMISSED; ORDERED, that a copy of this Report-Recommendation be forwarded to Chief United States District Court Judge Glenn T. Suddaby with the recommendation that an Order limiting Plaintiff's ability to initiate further litigation in this District be entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651(a). Objections to R&R due by 9/4/2018, Case Review Deadline 9/7/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 8/17/2018. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. By separate opinion, and in accordance with the authority granted by 28 U.S.C. 1915, the Court will review the sufficiency of the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 8/17/2018. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)
|
| Filing 4 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE REGARDING JUDGE D'AGOSTINO CASE DISPOSITION PILOT - Please refer to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Hon. Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge, for guidance regarding the Case Disposition Pilot. http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/sites/nynd/files/DAgostino_03142016.pdf. {Mailed Text Notice & Individual Rules to Plaintiff Bitetto} (mgh) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE mailed to Plaintiff on 8/14/2018. (mgh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marco Bitetto. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (mgh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lawrence E. Kahn filed by Marco Bitetto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(mgh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bitetto v. Kahn | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mr. Lawrence E. Kahn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dr. Marco Bitetto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
