Porco v. Saul
Plaintiff: Joan Porco
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv00837
Filed: July 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Referring Judge: Thomas J McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Joshua L. Kershner appearing for Commissioner of Social Security . (Kershner, Joshua)
August 5, 2020 Filing 7 AMENDED AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Joan Porco. (dpk)
August 5, 2020 TEXT NOTICE re: #1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus : Motion is on submit, no personal appearances unless otherwise directed. Response to Motion due by 10/2/2020. No Reply permitted. (copy of this text notice served on pro se party via regular mail.)(sg)
July 30, 2020 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint and Exhibits served on William Barr, U.S. Attorney General, Social Security Administration and U.S. Attorney on July 27, 2020 by certified mail/return receipt filed by Joan Porco. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(jel, )
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: Court has issued a summons in this case. (Dkt. No. #2 .) Plaintiff is directed to effectuate service of process upon defendant and file the appropriate proof of service once complete. Court also notes that a General Order 25 (Dkt. No. #4 ) was issued in this case setting a date for an initial conference and associated deadlines. Due to this case being a petition for writ of mandamus, it is exempt from General Order 25. Therefore, General Order 25 is not applicable to this case, the conference and associated deadlines are OFF and should be disregarded. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 7/30/2020. (copy of this text order served on pro se party via regular mail.)(sg)
July 27, 2020 Filing 4 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 10/26/2020 at 09:30 AM in Syracuse before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 10/19/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (jel, )
July 27, 2020 Filing 3 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE issued and explained to Joan Porco at time complaint was filed. (jel, )
July 27, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued to U.S. Attorney General, #2 Summons issued to U.S. Attorney)(jel, )
July 27, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1361 against Andrew M. Saul (Filing fee $400 receipt number ALB011822) filed by Joan Porco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-S, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jel, ) Modified on 7/29/2020 (jel, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Porco v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Joshua L. Kershner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joan Porco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?