Continental Western Insurance Company v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Continental Western Insurance Company |
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America |
1:2020cv01621 |
December 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Christian F Hummel |
Glenn T Suddaby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Continental Western Insurance Company. (Barclay, Kathleen) |
Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE: The Rule 16 Initial Conference scheduled for 2/2/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel and the deadline to submit a proposed Civil Case Management Plan and exchange Mandatory Disclosures are ADJOURNED without date pending a decision on the dispositive motion. (tab) |
TEXT NOTICE re Motion #4 to Dismiss: Response to Motion remains due by 1/26/2021. Any reply to this motion remains due by 2/2/2021. This motion is taken on submission of the papers and returnable before Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby. No appearances are required. (sal) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Response to Motion due by 1/26/2021. Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/2/2021 filed by The Travelers Indemnity Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Meg R. Reid, #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 Exhibit(s) 1- Complaint) (Reid, Meg) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 2/2/2021 at 10:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 1/26/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) [Copy served upon plaintiff's attorney via regular mail on 12/30/2020](kmc) |
***Answer due date set for The Travelers Indemnity Company of America answer due 1/5/2021. (kmc) |
Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT relating to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by The Travelers Indemnity Company of America. (kmc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Schenectady County Supreme Court, case number 2020-1879 (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5365228) filed by The Travelers Indemnity Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Continental Western Insurance Company v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Continental Western Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Kathleen A. Barclay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Travelers Indemnity Company of America | |
Represented By: | Meg R. Reid |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.