The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
| The Phoenix Insurance Company |
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv01265 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Lawrence E Kahn |
| Anne M Nardacci |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge Anne M Nardacci for all further proceedings. Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 1/18/2023. (khr)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER approving #6 Stipulation filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Answer due date updated for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company answer due 1/31/2023. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 12/27/2022. (tab)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Extending time to respond by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company submitted to Judge Hon. Lawrence E. Kahn. (Potashner, Marshall) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company on 12/9/2022, filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company. (Messineo, Tariq) |
| ***Answer due date updated for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company answer due 12/30/2022. (khr) |
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Phoenix Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Corporate Parent Travelers Insurance Group Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent The Travelers Indemnity Company, Corporate Parent The Travelers Companies, Inc. for The Phoenix Insurance Company.. (Messineo, Tariq) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 2/27/2023 09:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 2/21/2023. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (khr) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (khr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-6112226) filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Phoenix Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Tariq J. Messineo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
