Upstate Shredding, LLC v. Sinomet Recycling, S.A.
Plaintiff: Upstate Shredding, LLC
Defendant: Sinomet Recycling, S.A.
Case Number: 3:2008cv00940
Filed: September 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office
County: Tioga
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 DECISION AND ORDER granting Pltf's 40 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 1/14/10. (sfp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Upstate Shredding, LLC v. Sinomet Recycling, S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Upstate Shredding, LLC
Represented By: John L. Perticone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sinomet Recycling, S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?