Upstate Shredding, LLC et al v. Northeastern Ferrous, Inc. et al
| Upstate Shredding, LLC and Weitsman Shredding, LLC |
| Northeastern Ferrous, Inc. and Jay Goldblatt |
| 3:2012cv01015 |
| June 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Tioga |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| David E. Peebles |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 91) for reconsideration is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 98) to preclude evidence and for an award of attorneys fees is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Cross-Motion (Dkt. No. 104) for Rule 37 sanctions is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 109) for sanctions is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs request (Dkt. No. 115) for att orneys fees in responding to Defendants Motion for sanctions is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs submit an affidavit in support of their attorneys fees and costs in responding to Defendants Motion for sanctions within ten (10) days of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Defendants may file a response within seven (7) days of Plaintiffs filing their affidavit; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 112) to enforce the Protective Order is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs commit no further violations of the Protective Order and pay Defendants attorneys fees and costs of bringing the Motion to enforce the Protective Order; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants submit an affidavit in support of their attorneys fees and costs in filing the Motion to enforce the Protective Order within ten (10) days of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Plaintiffs may file a response within seven (7) days of Defendants filing their affidavit. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 02, 2016. (sas)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 25) for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent it seeks summary judgment on: (1) all of Plaintiffs claims against them; and (2) Northeastern Ferrous, Inc.s breach of contract counte rclaim against Plaintiffs, and DENIED to the extent it seeks summary judgment on all of Defendants other counterclaims against Plaintiffs. Additionally, all additional counterclaims against Plaintiffs are DISMISSED as duplicative of the breach of co ntract claim; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 31) for judgment on the pleadings or summary judgment on all claims against Third-Party Defendant Weitsman is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 30, 2014. (sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
