Kidney v. Webster et al
||Richard F. Kidney
||John Webster, Bill Shiohira, Melissa Fahey, Greg Foran, Doug McMillon, David Stills and Vestal Walmart Supercenter
||July 7, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of New York
||Lawrence E. Kahn
||David E. Peebles
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Personal Injury
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 27, 2017
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDERED, that Kidneys Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 21) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 5) is GRANTED on the grounds that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the individual defendants and that Kidneys allegations fail to state a plausible claim for relief; and it is further ORDERED, that Kidneys Complaint (Dkt. No. 2) is DISMISSED with leave to amend; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court terminate Gre g Foran, Doug McMillon, David Stills, and the Vestal Wal-Mart Supercenter as defendants in this case; and it is further ORDERED, that if Kidney wishes to proceed with this action, he must file an amended complaint as set forth above within thirty (30 ) days of the filing date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that if Kidney does not move to amend his Complaint within the time provided, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of John Webster, Bill Shiohira, and Melissa Fahey, and terminate them as defendants, with prejudice, without further order of the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 27, 2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(sas)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?