Paolini v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Diana Paolini
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2016cv01182
Filed: September 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Broome
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: that this case be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), pursuant to the 16 Consent Order of Remand signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, dated 4/5/2017. (hmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paolini v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Paolini
Represented By: Peter A. Gorton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Maria P. Fragassi Santangelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?