Brabus GmbH v. Bollinger Motors, LLC
| Brabus GmbH |
| Bollinger Motors, LLC |
| 3:2018cv01081 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| David E Peebles |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Brabus GmbH. Bollinger Motors, LLC waiver sent on 9/17/2018, answer due 11/16/2018. (Ugolev, Olga) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Olga Ugolev on behalf of Brabus GmbH (Ugolev, Olga) |
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Friscia. Counsel is hereby advised that as of January 16, 2018, the NYND has converted to NextGen. Due to this conversion, you must now register for Pro Hac Vice access through your PACER account. This is the only notice you will receive concerning this requirement. You will not have access to electronically file in this case until your Pro Hac Vice request has been processed through the PACER system. Step-by-step instructions on how to complete this process are available at http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-nextgen. COUNSEL MUST FILE A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE IN THIS ACTION OR HE/SHE WILL NOT RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILINGS IN THE CASE. Authorized by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 10/1/2018. (sal )
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Michael R. Friscia Filing fee $100, receipt number ANYNDC-4522719. filed by Brabus GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of James A. Kellar, #2 Attorney Registration Form, #3 Petition for Admission, #4 Certificate of Good Standing - NJ, #5 Certificate of Good Standing - NY, #6 Proposed Order) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Kellar, James) |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Olga Ugolev, Esq.. Counsel is hereby advised that as of January 16, 2018, the NYND has converted to NextGen. Due to this conversion, you must now register for Pro Hac Vice access through your PACER account. This is the only notice you will receive concerning this requirement. You will not have access to electronically file in this case until your Pro Hac Vice request has been processed through the PACER system. Step-by-step instructions on how to complete this process are available at http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-nextgen. *COUNSEL MUST FILE A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE IN THE ACTION OR HE/SHE WILL NOT RECEIVE ANY NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILINGS IN THIS MATTER* Authorized by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 9/24/2018. (sal )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Olga Ugolev Filing fee $100, receipt number ANYNDC-4516591. filed by Brabus GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of James A. Kellar, #2 Attorney Registration Form, #3 Petition for Admission, #4 Certificate of Good Standing - NJ, #5 Certificate of Good Standing - NY, #6 Proposed Order) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Kellar, James) |
| Filing 6 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE REGARDING JUDGE D'AGOSTINO CASE DISPOSITION PILOT - Please refer to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Hon. Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge, for guidance regarding the Case Disposition Pilot. http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/sites/nynd/files/DAgostino_03142016.pdf. (rep) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMISSION REQUIREMENT: As to Attorneys Michael R. Friscia, Esq. and Olga Ugolev, Esq. Phone number and email addresses are: (973) 622-4444, mfriscia@mccarter.com and ougolev@mccarter.com. Admissions are due by 9/24/2018. {Notice emailed to both attorneys on 9/10/2018}.(rep) |
| Filing 4 Report on the Filing and Determination of an Action regarding patent and/or trademark number 2,610,469. (rep) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 12/21/2018 at 10:30 AM in Binghamton, NY before Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/14/2018. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (rep) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Bollinger Motors, LLC. (rep) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION WITH JURY DEMAND: against Bollinger Motors, LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4502714), filed by Brabus GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(rep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brabus GmbH v. Bollinger Motors, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brabus GmbH | |
| Represented By: | James A. Kellar |
| Represented By: | Olga Ugolev |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bollinger Motors, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
