Sarwar v. Shree Hari Holdings LLC
Plaintiff: Saim Sarwar
Defendant: Shree Hari Holdings LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv01101
Filed: October 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Andrew T Baxter
Referring Judge: Thomas J McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2021 Filing 14 TEXT ORDER: A Joint Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/15/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) The telephonic Rule 16 conference is set for 12/22/2021 at 10:30 AM before U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. The parties are directed to dial 1-877-873-8017 and enter access code 3362194 to connect to the conference. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 12/3/2021. (kmc)
November 22, 2021 Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT re #12 Answer to Complaint by Shree Hari Holdings LLC. (Lanouette, Dawn)
November 22, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Shree Hari Holdings LLC.(Lanouette, Dawn)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER that the default entered by the Clerk as a result of Defendant's alleged failure to Answer the Complaint is hereby vacated; Defendant will not contest service of process in this action; Defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until November 22, 2021. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on November 19, 2021. (ztc, )
November 18, 2021 Filing 10 STIPULATION re #5 Summons Returned Executed, #7 Clerk's Entry of Default, #9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Shree Hari Holdings LLC filed by Saim Sarwar., #6 Request for Entry of Default, #1 Complaint, Clerk's Correction of Docket Entry vacating clerk's entry of default and providing answer be served by November 22, 2021 by Shree Hari Holdings LLC submitted to Judge McAvoy. (Lanouette, Dawn)
November 15, 2021 CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY #9 Motion for Default Judgment: Clerk added the following documents, Notice of Motion and Affidavit, pursuant to L.R. 7.1 (gmd, )
November 14, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Shree Hari Holdings LLC filed by Saim Sarwar. Response to Motion due by 12/6/2021. Reply to Response to Motion due by 12/13/2021 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order/Judgment) (Gillespie, Tristan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/15/2021: #2 Notice of Motion, #3 Affidavit) (gmd, ).
November 12, 2021 Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: In light of the #7 Clerk's Entry of Default, the Rule 16 conference set for 1/5/2022 and 12/29/2021 deadline for the submission of a joint Civil Case Management Plan and exchange of Mandatory Disclosures are ADJOURNED WITHOUT DATE. The hearing and related deadlines will be reset at a later date, if deemed necessary. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 11/12/2021. (kmc)
November 12, 2021 Filing 7 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT GRANTED as to Shree Hari Holdings LLC #6 Request for Entry of Default. (gmd, )
November 11, 2021 Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Shree Hari Holdings LLC by Saim Sarwar. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Service, #3 Proposed Order/Judgment)(Gillespie, Tristan)
October 28, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saim Sarwar. Shree Hari Holdings LLC served on 10/18/2021, answer due 11/8/2021. (Gillespie, Tristan)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting the Direct Assignment. The cases are deemed related. Authorized by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/14/2021. (amt)
October 7, 2021 Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Telephone Conference set for 1/5/2022 10:00 AM before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/29/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (ztc, )
October 7, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Shree Hari Holdings LLC. (ztc, )
October 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Injunctive Relief Demand against Shree Hari Holdings LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC5673636) filed by Saim Sarwar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztc, )
October 7, 2021 TEXT Notice pursuant to General Order 12 of Potential Related Case(s), submitted to District Judge for review and determination. Potential Related cases: 6:20-cv-01060. (ztc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sarwar v. Shree Hari Holdings LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saim Sarwar
Represented By: Tristan Wade Gillespie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shree Hari Holdings LLC
Represented By: Dawn J. Lanouette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?