Sarwar v. Zillion Management Inc.
Saim Sarwar |
Zillion Management Inc. |
3:2021cv01103 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Andrew T Baxter |
Thomas J McAvoy |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Zillion Management Inc. filed by Saim Sarwar. Response to Motion due by 12/6/2021. Reply to Response to Motion due by 12/13/2021 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order/Judgment) (Gillespie, Tristan) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: In light of the #7 Clerk's Entry of Default, the Rule 16 conference set for 1/6/2022 and 12/30/2021 deadline for the submission of a joint Civil Case Management Plan and exchange of Mandatory Disclosures are ADJOURNED WITHOUT DATE. The hearing and related deadlines will be reset at a later date, if deemed necessary. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 11/12/2021. (kmc) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Zillion Management Inc. (map) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Zillion Management Inc. by Saim Sarwar. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Service, #3 Proposed Order/Judgment)(Gillespie, Tristan) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saim Sarwar. Zillion Management Inc. served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. (Gillespie, Tristan) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting the Direct Assignment. The cases are deemed related. Authorized by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/14/2021. (amt) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference by Telephone set for 1/6/2022 at 10:00 AM before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/30/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (map) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Zillion Management Inc.. (map) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DEMAND against Zillion Management Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5675025) filed by Saim Sarwar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(map) |
TEXT Notice pursuant to General Order 12 of Potential Related Case(s), submitted to District Judge for review and determination. Potential Related cases: 6:20-cv-01060, 1:20-CV-1108, 1:20-cv-1111, 1:21-CV-0419, 3:20-cv-1119, etc. (map) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sarwar v. Zillion Management Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Saim Sarwar | |
Represented By: | Tristan Wade Gillespie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Zillion Management Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.