City of Syracuse v. American Underground Engineering, et al
| American Underground Engineering, Inc. |
| City of Syracuse |
| American Underground Engineering, Inc. |
| City of Syracuse |
| American Underground Engineering, Inc. |
| City of Syracuse |
| 5:2000cv00278 |
| February 14, 2000 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| David E. Peebles |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
SATISFACTION OF AMENDED JUDGMENT and ORDER thereby releasing 167 Supersedeas Bond.. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 8/5/2013. (bjw, )
|
|
Filing
168
ORDER STAYING ENFORCEMENT: pursuant to FRCvP 62(d), regarding the # 165 Notice of Appeal filed by the City of Syracuse that is appealing the # 164 Judgment, upon the filing of the # 167 Supersedeas Bond, the Court finds the Bond to be acceptable and therefore the enforcement proceedings in this matter are STAYED pursuant to FRCvP 62(d). Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 9/17/2012. (jmb)
|
|
Filing
164
AMENDED JUDGMENT to include prejudgment interest at a rate of 4.72% for the period beginning October 22, 1999 - October 13, 2011. (bjw, )
|
|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER: It is ordered that the # 147 Motion to Stay of the money Judgment pending appeal is GRANTED on the condition that defendant posts a supersedeas bond in the amount of $5,312,678.00, the full amount of the judgment, plus an additional 11% to cover interest and any damage for delay plus $250.00 to cover costs; it is further ordered that the 155 Motion to Alter Judgment is GRANTED insofar as the Court's Judgment dated October 13, 2011, shall be amended to reflect a prejudgment interest rate of 4.72%, which shall be applied to the period of October 22, 1999 through October 13, 2011. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 8/2/2012. (jmb)
|
|
Filing
145
JUDGMENT in favor of American Underground Engineering, Inc. against City of Syracuse in the amount of $5,312,678.00 plus prejudgment interest. (bjw, )
|
|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER: It is ordered that defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED, that defendant's motion for separate findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a)(1) is DENIED, that within ten days of this Memorandum-Decision & Order, plaintiff shall notify the Court and opposing counsel in writing whether it will elect to accept a remittitur that reduces the jury's award to $5,312,678.00 in damages, th e motion for a new trial is RESERVED until plaintiff notifies the Court and opposing counsel of its decision regarding the remittitur, if plaintiff accepts the remittitur, the Court will amend the judgment accordingly, if plaintiff rejects the remittitur, the Court will vacate the judgment and set a date for trial on the issue of damages only. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 10/7/2011. (jmb)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER: defendant AUE's # 53 Motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability related to its breach-of-contract counterclaims against Plaintiff City of Syracuse is DENIED. Further Ordered that this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles for all further pretrial matters. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 1/14/09. (jmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
