Oakes v. Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 5:2006cv00332
Filed: March 15, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
Presiding Judge: Gustave J. DiBianco
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 DECISION & ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on April 23, 2009. (sas)
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Recommending the Deft's motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be DENIED; Recommending the Pltf's motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and REMANDED for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 3/5/09. (amt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oakes v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?