Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Saunders Concrete Company, Inc. et al
| Hartford Fire Insurance Company |
| Canastota Concrete Company, Inc., Cortland Ready-Mix, Inc., Michael T. Saunders, Tracy Saunders and Saunders Concrete Company, Inc. |
| 5:2011cv00677 |
| June 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| David E. Peebles |
| Norman A. Mordue |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER: granting the # 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, defendants are directed to deposit the penal sum of the Bond $1,926,022.00 plus reasonable costs and expenses in the amount of $323,978.00 related to Plaint iff's potential ongoing pre-judgment interest and exposure to liability or loss, into an escrow account pending the outcome of this case. Defendants are directed to deposit $2,250,000.00 ($1,926,022.00 plus $323,978.00) into an es crow account pending the outcome of this case. It is ordered that within ten days of the date of this Memorandum-Decision & Order, the parties shall file and serve letter briefs, or no more than five pages in length, setting forth their respective positions regarding what remains to be accomplished to resolve this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 9/1/2012. (jmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
