Annese v. Sodexo, Inc.

Annese v. Sodexo, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Phillip Annese
Defendant:	Sodexo, Inc.
Case Number:	5:2012cv00412
Filed:	March 6, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Syracuse Office
County:	Tompkins
Presiding Judge:	Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge:	Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 2, 2012	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/2/2012. (jel, )
May 8, 2012	Filing 10 SUMMARY ORDER - That Annese's 7 Cross-Motion to Amend is GRANTED. That Annese shall - in accordance with requirements of, inter alia, FEd. R. Civ. P. 8(a) and N.D.N.Y.L.R.7.1(a)(4) - file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of this order. That Sodexo's 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED with leave to renew within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the Amended Complaint. That if Sodexo elects not to challenge the sufficiency of the Amended Complaint, it must file the appropriate responsive pleadings within the time alloted by the rules. That the parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Dancks to schedule further proceedings in accordance with the order. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/8/2012. (jel, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 2, 2012

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/2/2012. (jel, )

May 8, 2012

Filing 10 SUMMARY ORDER - That Annese's 7 Cross-Motion to Amend is GRANTED. That Annese shall - in accordance with requirements of, inter alia, FEd. R. Civ. P. 8(a) and N.D.N.Y.L.R.7.1(a)(4) - file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of this order. That Sodexo's 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED with leave to renew within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the Amended Complaint. That if Sodexo elects not to challenge the sufficiency of the Amended Complaint, it must file the appropriate responsive pleadings within the time alloted by the rules. That the parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Dancks to schedule further proceedings in accordance with the order. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/8/2012. (jel, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Annese v. Sodexo, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sodexo, Inc.
Represented By:	Daniel J. Moore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Annese
Represented By:	Luciano L. Lama
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?