Social Language Processing, Inc. v. Ott et al
| Social Language Processing, Inc. |
| Myle Ott, Jeffrey T. Hancock and Claire Cardie |
| 5:2013cv00401 |
| April 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David E. Peebles |
| David N. Hurd |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
AMENDED DECISION & ORDER that the Report Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Peebles is accepted in whole; and that Pltf's operative complaint is DISMISSED (ECF No. 76). Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/31/2016. (see)
|
|
Filing
111
DECISION & ORDER that Magistrate Judge Peebles' 110 Report and Recommendation is accepted in whole; and pltf's 1 complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/23/2016. (see)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting in part 36 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint or, Alternatively, to Transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District court for the Northern District of New York. The Clerk of Court shall transmit this cause and all the records pertaining thereto to the Clerk of Court of the Northern District of New York. Case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 4/9/2013. (ams)[Transferred from Florida Southern on 4/10/2013.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
