DS Parent, Inc. v. Teich et al
||DS Parent, Inc. and Davis-Standard, LLC
||Donald Teich and Sam North America, LLC
||December 3, 2013
||US District Court for the Northern District of New York
||Lawrence E. Kahn
||David E. Peebles
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 10, 2014
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 12 Motion for Permanent Injunction: ORDERED, that the TRO (Dkt. No. 18) is, to the extent it remains in effect, DISSOLVED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Motion (Dkt. No. 12) for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 2/10/14. (ban)
|January 17, 2014
DECISION and ORDERED, that the provision ( (a) of page 3) of the TRO (Dkt. No. 18) enjoining Teich from working for or rendering services to SAM or other employers engaged in certain enumerated pursuits, is WITHDRAWN; and it is further ORDERED, that, upon Plaintiffs posting of a $45,000 security in accordance with Local Rule 65.1.1 and service of notice on Teich that such security has been posted, the provision ( (a) of page 3) of the TRO (Dkt. No. 18) enjoining Teich from working for or rendering services to SAM or other employers engaged in certain enumerated pursuits shall be REINSTATED without further order of the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 17, 2014. (sas)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?