Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Rylene Patricia Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 5:2018cv01105
Filed: September 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Christian F Hummel
Referring Judge: Gary L Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kristina D. Cohn appearing for Commissioner of Social Security . Social Security Administrative Transcript due by 12/27/2018. (Cohn, Kristina)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 9/19/2018. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(khr)
September 14, 2018 Filing 6 Social Security Appeal Case Assignment Form and General Order #18 Issued. Pursuant to General Order #18, in the event the Plaintiff does not timely consent, or if the United States timely withdraws its consent, the case will be reassigned to a District Judge consistent with General Order #12. (khr)Mailed copy to pro se plaintiff on 9/17/2018.
September 14, 2018 Filing 5 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE issued and explained to Rylene Patricia Smith at time complaint was filed on 9/14/2018. Provided pro se plaintiff with all filed documents. (khr)
September 14, 2018 Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY CONSENT / DECLINATION FORM filed by Rylene Patricia Smith advising of declination of consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (khr)
September 14, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rylene Patricia Smith. Motions referred to Christian F. Hummel. (khr)
September 14, 2018 Filing 2 Social Security Identification Form [LODGED] [Pursuant to General Order #18, this document has been electronically lodged with the Court and will be removed from the docket upon the filing of the Administrative Transcript. Viewable by case participants and court personnel only, it is not a filed document, therefore is not available for public inspection. Any further distribution or dissemination is prohibited]. (khr)
September 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - Social Security Appeal. [Pursuant to General Order #18, Section B(3), the CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing to the USAO-NDNY and Regional Counsel for the Social Security Administration. Service of a Complaint along with the Social Security Identification Form under the Pilot Program will be considered complete only when the three steps in paragraph 3(A), 3(B) and 3(C) of General Order #18 have been completed.]. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Kristina D. Cohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rylene Patricia Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?