Ford v. Excellus Health Plan, Inc.
Steven J. Ford |
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. and Excellus Health Plan, Inc. doing business as Excellus Blue Cross Blue Shield |
5:2018cv01423 |
December 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
David E Peebles |
Glenn T Suddaby |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Answer due date to Amended Complaint Per 6 Text Order updated for Excellus Health Plan, Inc. answer due 2/28/2019. (sal ) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Excellus Health Plan, Inc. filed by Steven J. Ford.(Shannon, Kelsey) |
Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Due to a conflict with Magistrate Judge Peebles' schedule, the in person Initial Conference set for 3/14/2019 at 10:00 AM is RESCHEDULED for 4/4/2019 at 11:00 AM in Syracuse, 10th floor, before Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles. The Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 3/28/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (sal) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Letter Request. The Plaintiff shall be permitted to amend his complaint, should he choose to do so, by stipulation of the parties on or before January 31, 2019. The time for Defendant Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus Blue Cross Blue Shield to answer or otherwise move in response to plaintiff's Complaint, or any amended Complaint that plaintiff may file, is hereby extended up to and including February 28, 2019. The defendant agrees to waive any defenses as to service of the complaint or any amended complaint as well as any defense of lack of personal jurisdiction. The in person Rule 16 Conference scheduled for January 15, 2019 at 9:30 AM is rescheduled for March 14, 2019 at 10:00 AM in Syracuse, 10th floor, before Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles. The Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before March 5, 2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.). Authorized by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 12/17/2018. (sal ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelsey W. Shannon on behalf of Steven J. Ford (Shannon, Kelsey) |
Filing 4 Letter Motion from Defendant Excellus Health Plan, Inc. for Excellus Health Plan, Inc. requesting Extension of Deadlines to Amend and Answer submitted to Judge Peebles . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Stipulation to Extend Time)(Messer, Suzanne) |
***Answer due date updated for Excellus Health Plan, Inc. answer due 12/17/2018. (jdp, ) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 1/15/2019 at 09:30 AM in Syracuse before Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 1/8/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (jdp, ) |
Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT filed by Steven J. Ford. (jdp, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Onondaga County Supreme Court, Case number 010454/2018 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 4585976) filed by Excellus Health Plan, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jdp, ) Modified on 12/13/2018 (jdp, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.