Scognamiglio et al v. Tagliamonte
| Stacey B. Anish and David M. Scognamiglio |
| Cheryl Tagliamonte |
| 5:2019cv01398 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 2/12/2020 at 1:30 PM in Binghamton before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 2/5/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (pjh) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Cheryl Tagliamonte. (pjh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cheryl Tagliamonte (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4941476) filed by David M. Scognamiglio and Stacey B. Anish. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Contract to Purchase, #2 Exhibit B - Real Estate Contract Attorney's Approval Form, #3 Exhibit C - Email Correspondence, #4 Verification of Complaint by David M. Scognamiglio, #5 Verification of Complaint by Stacey B. Anish, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
