Omidian et al v. Board of Education of the New Hartford Central School District
| 6:2005cv00398 |
| March 31, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Utica Office |
| George H. Lowe |
| Norman A. Mordue |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: approving the # 77 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees to either party. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 1/25/2010. (jmb)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER denying defendant's 51 Motion in Limine. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 10/27/09. (jlr/sr)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying the 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part the 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. ORDERED that plaintiffs 17 motion for summary judgment is DENIED; that defendants 20 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the IDEA claim, and DENIED with respect to the Rehabilitation Act claim. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 3/31/2009. (jlr/sr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Omidian et al v. Board of Education of the New Hartford Central School District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
