Jackson v. Berryhill

Jackson v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Bernice Jackson
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	6:2017cv01110
Filed:	October 5, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Utica Office
County:	Oneida
Presiding Judge:	David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit:	Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 30, 2018	Filing 18 JUDGMENT in favor of Nancy A. Berryhill against Bernice Jackson. It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. The Acting Commissioner's determination that the plaintiff was not disabled at the r elevant times, and thus is not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act, is AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that the clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment, based upon this determination, DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint in its entirety. (meb)
August 29, 2018	Filing 17 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. The Acting Commissioner's determination that the plaintiff was not disabled at the relevant times, and thus is not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act, is AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that the clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment, based upon this determination, DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint in its entirety. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 8/29/2018. (meb)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 30, 2018

Filing 18 JUDGMENT in favor of Nancy A. Berryhill against Bernice Jackson. It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. The Acting Commissioner's determination that the plaintiff was not disabled at the r elevant times, and thus is not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act, is AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that the clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment, based upon this determination, DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint in its entirety. (meb)

August 29, 2018

Filing 17 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. The Acting Commissioner's determination that the plaintiff was not disabled at the relevant times, and thus is not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act, is AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that the clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment, based upon this determination, DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint in its entirety. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 8/29/2018. (meb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernice Jackson
Represented By:	Elizabeth V. Krupar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By:	Catharine L. Zurbrugg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?