Dotson v. Kuliesius et al
| Monique Dotson |
| Dina Kuliesius, R.N. Elizabeth, Temitore Margaret Dube, Dr. Adam P. Fenton and St. Luke's Campus - FSLH Emergency Room |
| 6:2021cv00763 |
| July 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SECOND OBJECTION to the #6 Report and Recommendations filed by Pro Se Plaintiff Monique Dotson. (map) |
| Filing 10 Letter Request Motion requesting a "Court Order for a forensic testing" filed by Pro Se Plaintiff Monique Dotson. Submitted to U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino. (map) Clerk modified docket text on 8/13/2021 to reflect the District Judge letter request motion is submitted to. (map) |
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to the #6 Report and Recommendations filed by Pro Se Plaintiff Monique Dotson. (map) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Monique Dotson requesting Two Week Extension of Time to file objections to #6 Report-Recommendation and Order: It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's request for a 2 week extension of time to file objections to #6 Report-Recommendation and Order, is GRANTED; Objections to R&R due by 8/12/2021. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 7/29/21. (Copy served via regular mail upon plaintiff)(ban) |
| Filing 7 Letter Request Motion filed by Pro Se Plaintiff Monique Dotson requesting a two week extension of the time to reply to the #6 ORDER & REPORT-RECOMMENDATION submitted to U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. (map) |
Filing 6
ORDER & REPORT-RECOMMENDATION: WHEREFORE, based on the findings within, it is ORDERED, that plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED FOR PURPOSES OF FILING ONLY, and it is RECOMMENDED, that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, but without the opportunity for amendment, and it is ORDERED, that plaintiffs #4 Motion to Obtain an ECF Login and Password is DENIED. :(Objections to R&R due by 7/28/2021, Case Review Deadline 8/2/2021). Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 07/14/2021. (Copy served on Pro Se Plaintiff Monique Dotson via regular mail)(map)
|
| Clerk mailed a copy of the 5 Text-Only Notice Regarding Judge D'Agostino Case Disposition Pilot to Monique Dotson on 7/8/2021 by regular mail. (see) |
| Filing 5 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE REGARDING JUDGE D'AGOSTINO CASE DISPOSITION PILOT - Please refer to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Hon. Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge, for guidance regarding the Case Disposition Pilot. https://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/sites/nynd/files/MAD_Rules_of_Practice_04_14_2020.pdf. (dpk) |
| Filing 4 Pro Se MOTION to Obtain ECF Login and Password filed by Monique Dotson. Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (dpk) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE issued and explained at time complaint was filed (dpk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Monique Dotson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to Temitore Margaret Dube, #2 Proposed Summons as to St. Luke's - FSLH Emergency Room, #3 Proposed Summons as to Adam Fenton, #4 Proposed Summons as to R.N. Elizabeth) Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (dpk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Temitore Margaret Dube, Adam P. Fenton, Dina Kuliesius, R.N. Elizabeth and St. Luke's Campus - FSLH Emergency Room filed by Monique Dotson.(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dpk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
