Mushtare v. Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 7:2006cv01055
Filed: August 31, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Watertown Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge: George H. Lowe
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DECISION & ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that the Commissioners decision denying disability benefits is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15) and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 12, 2009. (sas)
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits be REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with this recommendation and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g).Objections to R&R due by 8/10/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 7/27/09. (dmf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mushtare v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?