American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. V.M. Paolozzi Imports, Inc. et al
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. |
V.M. Paolozzi Imports, Inc. and DealMaker of Potsdam, LLC |
7:2010cv00955 |
August 6, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Watertown Office |
Jefferson |
Andrew T. Baxter |
Frederick J. Scullin |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 CONSENT JUDGMENT: Approving the # 72 proposed consent judgment. This action is hereby dismissed as noted herein. (nmk) |
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER granting 40 Motion to Strike and granting 48 Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiff's motion to strike the counterclaims is GRANTED and plaintiff's motion to hold defendants in contempt and impose per diem sanctions is GRANTED. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Baxter for all further pretrial matters. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 3/26/2013. (lah) |
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER directing Defendants to file and serve affidavits to Show Cause why they should not be held in contempt w/in 14 days of the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order; Plaintiff may file and serve a response w/in 10 days of the date of Defendant's filing of their submissions; Plaintiff shall file and serve an affidavit and documentation re: costs w/in 14 days from the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 9/1/2012. (amt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.